🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."